Prop firms that offer a $100,000 account, a size many firms sell and a useful point of comparison between them.
A $100K account gives you a simulated balance of $100,000 to trade under the firm's rules. The size sets the scale of everything else: a 10% target is $10,000, a 5% daily limit is $5,000 and a 10% maximum loss is $10,000. Many firms offer this size, which makes it a useful point of comparison, since the fee and the dollar value of each rule can be compared directly. The firms listed above offer at least one program at this size.
A $100K account suits traders who have a tested strategy, can size positions correctly for the balance and want payouts large enough to matter. It suits traders who have passed a smaller challenge and want to step up. On futures programs, a 100K account usually allows more contracts than smaller sizes, which suits traders who scale in and out of positions. It suits first time traders less well, because the fee is higher and a mistake costs more.
The fee is higher than for smaller accounts, and a failed attempt costs more. The percentage rules are usually the same as on smaller sizes, so a bigger account does not make the test easier; it only raises the stakes in dollars. Some firms price larger accounts more cheaply per $1,000 than smaller ones, while others do not, so the headline fee can mislead. On futures programs, a 100K label often comes with a fixed dollar drawdown and a contract limit that matter more than the balance itself. Two smaller accounts can sometimes cost about the same as one large one and spread the risk, though firms set limits on how many accounts and how much total allocation one trader can hold.
Because every firm on this list offers the same size, the fees are directly comparable, but the fee is only the start. Put each program's fee next to its profit target, daily loss limit and maximum loss in dollars, then note the drawdown type. A program that costs more but has a static maximum loss may give you more room than a cheaper one with a trailing limit. Add the cost of a reset if the firm offers one, and any activation fee on futures programs. Then compare the payout side: profit split, first payout timing and any consistency rule. Each firm's profile lists its programs and rules, and the comparison table filters firms by platform and country.
The guide to account size sets out whether a bigger account is always the better choice, prop firm challenge cost covers total spend across attempts, and funded account risk management covers position sizing for larger balances. For growth beyond the starting size, see the payouts and scaling guides.
Prices vary by firm, format and market, and they change often, especially during sales. Rather than relying on a single figure, compare fees as a price per $1,000 of account size and add any reset or activation fee. Each firm's profile lists the list price of its programs, and discount codes can lower the price further for a limited time.
The percentage rules are usually the same, so the test is no harder in principle. The difference is scale: a 5% daily limit is $5,000 instead of $500, and position sizes must rise to reach the target. The risk comes from behaviour, since larger numbers can tempt traders to take bigger positions than their plan allows.
Two smaller accounts spread the risk, since one breach does not end both, and they can sometimes cost about the same. One larger account is simpler to manage and may carry better scaling terms. Before splitting, check the firm's rules on holding several accounts, copying trades between them and the maximum total allocation allowed per trader.
There is no typical figure. Earnings depend on your returns, the profit split, the payout frequency and any payout cap. As an illustration, a 3% monthly return on $100,000 with an 80% split would pay $2,400 before any fees, but returns vary widely from month to month. Treat any figure as a scenario, not an expectation.