Prop firms with a single phase evaluation: reach one profit target within the loss limits and move to a funded account.
A one step challenge has a single evaluation phase. You reach one profit target without breaking the daily or maximum loss limit, meet any minimum trading days, and the firm offers a funded account. Two step challenges split the test into two phases with separate targets. The firms listed above offer at least one single phase program, and the list changes as firms add or retire programs.
One step programs suit traders who want the shortest route to a funded account and whose strategy produces steady returns with small drawdowns. They also suit traders who have passed two phase challenges before and found that the second phase added time without telling them anything new about their trading. They suit traders less well if their results come in uneven bursts, because tighter loss limits leave less room for a losing run before the target is reached.
The single phase usually comes at a cost elsewhere. The profit target is often higher than the first phase of a two step challenge, and the maximum loss is often smaller. Many one step programs use a trailing maximum loss that rises with your highest balance, which tightens the limit as you make progress. Some firms charge more for one step than for two step at the same account size, and some pair the program with a lower starting profit split or a consistency rule on the funded account. The time saved can be real, but the margin for error is smaller.
Put the profit target and the maximum loss side by side for each program, since the ratio between them says more about the test than either number alone. Then compare the drawdown type, because a static limit gives more room than a trailing one of the same size. Look at the fee as a price per $1,000 of account size so that different sizes can be compared, and include the cost of a reset or retry if the firm offers one. Finally, compare the funded account terms: profit split, first payout timing and any consistency rule. Each firm's profile sets these out program by program, and the comparison table narrows the field by platform and country.
One step vs two step challenges compares the two formats in detail, and firms offering the two phase format are listed under two step challenges. For drawdown mechanics, see trailing vs static drawdown, and for planning an attempt, see how to build a prop firm trading plan.
Not necessarily. You only need to pass once, but the target is often higher and the loss limits tighter, so the room for error is smaller. Whether it suits you depends on your strategy: steady trading with shallow drawdowns fits a single phase, while strategies with deeper swings may be better served by the extra room of a two step program.
It depends on the target, your risk per trade and any minimum trading days. Some programs have no time limit and others set a deadline. Plan around the number of trades your strategy needs to reach the target at normal risk rather than trying to finish quickly, because raising risk to save time is a common way to break the daily loss limit.
Many do. A trailing maximum loss moves up with your highest balance or equity, so the limit tightens as you make profit. Some firms stop the trailing once the limit reaches the starting balance. Check the exact wording, including whether trailing is based on closed balance or on open equity, because the difference matters on winning trades you have not yet closed.
The firm reviews your account, runs identity checks and issues a funded account, usually with a trader agreement to sign. The funded account may have different rules from the challenge, such as a consistency rule, a minimum number of days before the first payout or a different daily limit. Read the funded terms before you buy the challenge, not after you pass.