Prop firms with a two phase evaluation: pass a first target, then a second, lower one, before moving to a funded account.
A two step challenge splits the evaluation into two phases. The first phase sets a profit target that is commonly around 8% to 10%, and the second sets a lower one, commonly around 5%, with the same or similar loss limits throughout. Pass both without breaking a rule and the firm offers a funded account. The format has been used in forex and CFD prop trading for many years, and many firms still build their main program around it. The firms listed above offer at least one two phase program.
Two step programs suit traders who value room for error over speed. Loss limits are often wider than on single phase programs, and the second target is lower, which helps strategies that have uneven weeks or hold trades for several days. The format also suits traders who want to prove consistency to themselves before trading a funded account, since passing twice under the same rules is a firmer test of a strategy than passing once.
The main cost is time. Two phases take longer than one, and at many firms minimum trading day rules apply in each phase. There are also two chances to break a rule, so a single bad day in phase two can end an attempt that was nearly complete. Fees are often lower than single phase programs of the same size, though not always, and some firms refund the fee with the first payout. Pricing that looks cheap can also hide a lower profit split on the funded account or a longer wait for the first payout.
Compare programs of the same account size. Put the two targets next to the maximum loss, then check whether the maximum loss is static or trailing, since a static limit gives more room for the same headline figure. Convert each fee to a price per $1,000 of account size, and include any fee refund in your view of the total cost. On the funded side, compare the profit split, the first payout date, the payout frequency and any consistency rule. Each firm's profile sets out its programs and rules, and the comparison table lets you filter by platform, asset and country.
For a side by side view of the formats, see one step vs two step challenges, and firms with a single phase are listed under one step challenges. How long it takes to pass a challenge covers realistic timelines, and a successful evaluation day by day shows how an attempt can be paced across both phases.
It depends on the targets, your risk per trade and any minimum trading days in each phase. Many firms no longer set a time limit, so the pace is up to you. Trading at your normal risk rather than pushing for speed keeps the loss limits intact, and the second phase is usually shorter because its target is lower.
The target is lower, often around half of the first, but the loss limits usually stay the same, so the test is shorter rather than looser. Traders sometimes raise their risk in phase two to finish quickly, which can end an attempt that was nearly complete. Treat phase two as a repeat of phase one with a closer finish line.
Some firms refund the fee, usually with the first or a later payout from the funded account rather than when you pass. Others do not refund it at all, and some include the refund only on certain programs. Check the terms for when the refund is paid and whether it depends on reaching a minimum payout or staying funded for a set period.
The rules usually allow it, but the same loss limits apply in both phases, so a change of strategy adds risk rather than removing it. Some firms also review funded accounts where the trading style changes sharply from the evaluation, such as far larger positions or a new type of strategy. Keeping the same approach throughout is simpler to manage.