Prop firms with a three phase evaluation: reach a profit target in each of three phases within the loss limits to receive a funded account.
A three step challenge splits the evaluation into three phases. You reach a profit target in each phase without breaking the daily or maximum loss limit, meet any minimum trading days, and move to the next phase on a fresh balance. After the third phase the firm offers a funded account. Targets per phase are usually lower than in one step or two step challenges, and some firms price three phase programs below their other formats. The firms listed above sell at least one three phase program, and the list changes as firms add or retire programs.
The table compares three made up programs on a $100,000 example account for a trader who averages 1% of profit a week. It is an illustration only: real returns are uneven, and no firm's targets are shown.
| Format | Target in each phase | Total profit across phases | Weeks at 1% a week |
|---|---|---|---|
| One step | 10% | 10% | 10 |
| Two step | 8% then 5% | 13% | 13 |
| Three step | 6% in each | 18% | 18 |
Each phase starts again from the starting balance, so profit does not carry over. The three step trader makes more profit in total and spends longer being tested, but each target is smaller, which means less pressure to take large positions in any one phase. Each phase is also another chance to hit a loss limit, so low targets do not make a program automatically easier to pass. Minimum trading days add time as well: three phases with a four day minimum means at least twelve trading days, however fast the trader is.
Three step programs suit traders whose returns are steady but modest, such as those who risk a small share of the account per trade and take a handful of trades a week. They suit traders who are not in a hurry and who prefer smaller targets per phase to a single large one. They suit traders less well if they want funding quickly, or if their results come in occasional large wins, since each extra phase adds time and another set of limits.
The lower targets come with a longer test. More phases mean more time between buying and a first payout, and more points at which a single bad day can end the attempt. Some three step programs pair the low targets with tighter loss limits, a lower starting profit split or a smaller payout cap on the funded account. Where a fee refund is offered, it usually comes with the first payout, which is further away. Keeping the same discipline across three separate phases is a test in its own right.
Firms set the phase targets differently: equal targets in each phase, falling targets, or a larger first target followed by smaller ones. Some keep the same daily and maximum loss across all three phases, while others change them. Minimum trading days, time limits per phase and rules on news trading or weekend holding can also differ between phases. On the funded side, firms differ on the profit split, first payout timing and whether the fee is refunded.
Add up the profit needed across all three phases and set it against the maximum loss in each, since the ratio of target to room says more about the test than the number of phases. Then compare the drawdown type, the minimum days in total and whether any phase has a deadline. Look at the fee as a price per $1,000 of account size and compare it with the same firm's two step program, which may be priced differently for a shorter test. Finish with the funded terms. Each firm's profile sets out its programs phase by phase, and the comparison table narrows the field by platform and country.
Firms offering shorter formats are listed under one step challenges and two step challenges, and one step vs two step challenges compares those formats. How long it takes to pass a challenge covers timelines, and programs without deadlines are listed under challenges with no time limit.
Not necessarily. Each target is usually smaller, which reduces the pressure in any one phase, but you must pass three phases instead of two, make more profit in total and stay inside the loss limits for longer. Whether it suits you depends on your returns: steady, modest gains fit the format, while occasional large wins fit it less well.
It depends on the targets, your returns and any minimum trading days. As a made up example, a trader averaging 1% a week needs about 18 weeks to make 6% in each of three phases, plus time for each new account to be reviewed and issued. Some programs have no time limit per phase and others set a deadline, so check both.
Sometimes. Some firms price three step programs below their one step and two step formats at the same account size, and others do not. Compare the fee as a price per $1,000 of account size, then weigh the time involved: a cheaper program that takes months longer to pass also delays the first payout and any fee refund.
At some firms they do. Targets may fall from phase to phase, and minimum days, time limits or restrictions on news and weekend trading can differ. The funded account may add further rules, such as a consistency requirement. Read the rules for every phase and for the funded account before buying, rather than only those for the first phase.